To ensure the published research in Revue academique: Modern Social Realities Journal (RAMSR) meets the highest standards of quality, relevance, and academic integrity, the journal uses a clearly defined peer review process that is both transparent and well-managed. We also aim to assist authors in bringing out their finest work keeping equity and credibility in scholarly communication.

How the Review Process Works

1. Initial Editorial Check

After a manuscript has been submitted, it is referred to the editorial team, which verifies its compliance with the journal focus, submission rules and regulations and ethical practices.

2. Double-Blind Review

RAMSR adopts a peer review system which is blinded i.e. both the authors and the reviewers remain unknown. This will be guaranteed to make it objective only on the content of the manuscript.

3. Evaluation by Experts

The manuscript is evaluated by qualified reviewers with subject knowledge on the basis of:

• Originality and contribution to knowledge.
• Clarity and structure
• Methodological soundness
• Ethical and analytical rigour.
• Applicability to the topic of the journal.

4. Review Feedback and Recommendations

The reviewers make clear and constructive comments, as well as either of the following recommendations:

• Accept
• Accept with minor revisions
• Revise and re-submission (considerable changes)
• Reject

5. Editorial Decision

Reviewer feedback is taken into consideration and the final decision is made by the editor and is reported to the author with remarks and suggestions on how he can amend it.

Our Principles of Peer Review

• Equity: No discrimination in any way.
• Confidentiality: This is ensured by preserving submission and reviewer identities.
• Constructive Feedback: The intention of reviewers is to help authors by giving constructive comments, which are helpful and not offensive.
• Timeliness: Timeliness The journal aims to ensure that the process of reviewing articles is timely in order to value the time and effort of the authors.

What Authors Can Expect

• Rigorous and professional criticism of their work.
• Openness in communication at every review level.
• Mentoring that can be used to enhance the overall quality of the manuscript.

The peer review system at RAMSR is such that only valid, instructive, and well-put research is included in the current discourse of contemporary social realities. Through high standards, the journal has ensured academic excellence with respect to providing authors with academic support.